Marden Henge (and Hatfield Barrow) forum 3 room
Image by juamei
close
more_vert

Not sure I am with you Moss. There is a bit of a mystery infused glaze to media reporting to promote why 'the public' that have never heard of it should be interested, but I thought Maev conveyed the feel of this particular dig rather well. Her writing will make some want to know more, job done.

There is rather a lot to think about when you get past all the have you never heard of stuff. Hence I attempted to highlight the bank archaeology on another thread. From being one of the least talked about aspects, other than the cliche of it not being defensive, to have to think of banks as more than spoil from the ditch is an enforced leap for public thinking. And I am not just saying that because I loathe seeing those wooden staircases at Avebury (though I do, albeit something had to be done). There was a serious proposal to mount a wooden staircase on Silbury - can you imagine that?

Hi VBB, Yes it was a very good article by Maeve Kennedy hence the reason for highlighting it, it was just nit-picking on my part about forgetting that Silbury was the tallest artifical hill. As for wooden stairs, the roman Bartlow barrows in Cambridgeshire which are very tall, have wooden steps up the side, and it may protect the barrows but it looks horrible and on Silbury would look even worse.

The point that the houses are on top of the bank of the henge of course turns theories upside down, to me it points that henges are specific gathering places, whether for ceremony or to construct another monument somewhere else in the landscape. But I also think that henges must be classed using different names because they may be function in different ways - corralling animals maybe if people have to live on the banks of the henge....

moss wrote:
Not sure I am with you Moss. There is a bit of a mystery infused glaze to media reporting to promote why 'the public' that have never heard of it should be interested, but I thought Maev conveyed the feel of this particular dig rather well. Her writing will make some want to know more, job done.

There is rather a lot to think about when you get past all the have you never heard of stuff. Hence I attempted to highlight the bank archaeology on another thread. From being one of the least talked about aspects, other than the cliche of it not being defensive, to have to think of banks as more than spoil from the ditch is an enforced leap for public thinking. And I am not just saying that because I loathe seeing those wooden staircases at Avebury (though I do, albeit something had to be done). There was a serious proposal to mount a wooden staircase on Silbury - can you imagine that?

Hi VBB, Yes it was a very good article by Maeve Kennedy hence the reason for highlighting it, it was just nit-picking on my part about forgetting that Silbury was the tallest artifical hill. As for wooden stairs, the roman Bartlow barrows in Cambridgeshire which are very tall, have wooden steps up the side, and it may protect the barrows but it looks horrible and on Silbury would look even worse.

The point that the houses are on top of the bank of the henge of course turns theories upside down, to me it points that henges are specific gathering places, whether for ceremony or to construct another monument somewhere else in the landscape. But I also think that henges must be classed using different names because they may be function in different ways - corralling animals maybe if people have to live on the banks of the henge....

It has long bugged that the rural district built houses into the lip of Marden henge in the same period they were attempting to move folk out of Avebury, it is then some irony that the ancient building at Marden mirrors those of Hatfields that were built into the outer henge bank half a century ago.