The Thornborough Henges 71
Image by Vicster
The Thornborough Henges

Setting

There are two different forms of setting though aren't there. The archaeological setting and the site's (possible) contemporary setting. The difference is only minor and hard to quantify, but the latter needs a fixed point in time. The former requires a timeframe.

>> And of course, once you start on about ruining the view it hands them the chance to say No problem, we'll reinstate everything.

Obviously the setting must include all archaeology within the viewshed :-)

I suppose a further addition of something like : "As far as a continuous band of relative archaeology continues"

... allowing a reasonable, but not fixed, distance between sites. Then, for example, the setting could be a circular area with a couple of spidering sections to take in roads or settlements.

Defining the setting of a site must be done on a site-by-site basis, but you have to start with a minimum somewhere.

Taking the example of Stonehenge or Avebury, land around the henges has to come under special protection, such as SSI, it has to revert back to natural cover, and the archaeology as such has to be explained to the general public. Cope's map of the Neolithic environment of the Ure/Swale Plateau has to be married to Hardings archaeological findings. The Guardian's article referring to it as something like the Natzca Inca lines is a good parallel, it has to be interpreted and then, to quote; "all the magic of modern, sustainable, landscape-respecting tourism will be deployed here." The Stonehenge/Avebury landscapes got there, (not mentioning roads here) so perhaps Thornborough can also retrieve its magic divorced from hedgerows and large gravel holes........