The Thornborough Henges forum 71 room
Image by Moth
The Thornborough Henges

Absence of evidence..

close
more_vert
goffik G
goffik May 26, 2005 12:56:11
Replying to Rhiannon

Not sure of the facts myself, but it does seem logical to me... I think the "no fag butts in cathedral" image is accurate!

It's frustrating, though, isn't it? They say it's alright because they've not found anything (I'm sure that's not quite the case though, is it, Tarmac?) but it's still Thornborough fkn Henges, innit?

Just cos, for example, you may not be able to find any archaeological remains at somewhere like, oh, Stonehenge - would that make it acceptable to build a bloody car park there, or something? Eh? If you started quarrying near there, there'd be a right old bloody fuss, I'm sure, even if you couldn't find any bloody bollocking archaeology.

Blimey.

>puff, pant<

G x

R Rhiannon
Rhiannon May 26, 2005 13:09:15
Replying to goffik

well exactly. It's not like they've found nothing and it's in the middle of er, nothing. They claim to have found nothing and it's right next door to three great big bleedin' henges! It's kind of diversionary tactics, to get people arguing about the wrong thing, to get the focus in on the details when it should be the bigger picture, the landscape itself. It's not even as though the main attraction is some negligible mark on an arial photo (such as extremists like ourselves would get worked up about) - they are large as life henges with banks and ditches which anyone can see and roam around.