Glastonbury Tor forum 12 room
Image by Arcturus
close
more_vert

But surely, putting a church on top of Glastonbury Tor was an act of vandalism, in the first place. And I know that 'two wrongs don't make a right' but 'desperate times need desperate measures' (to quote the British inventor of the Metric System). Can anyone envisage what the Tor would look like without the tower ?

"But surely, putting a church on top of Glastonbury Tor was an act of vandalism"

Well its true, all these places have been used for their own purposes by every age. But we've invented the concept of Conservation and are better than that now, surely?

And look at the quality of the main hijackers of heritage places that remain these days - book promoters, the Big Brother production company, Trinny & Susannah and probably most often of all the effing Countryside Alliance. Anything that involves that lot can't be right, can it?

StoneGloves wrote:
But surely, putting a church on top of Glastonbury Tor was an act of vandalism, in the first place. And I know that 'two wrongs don't make a right' but 'desperate times need desperate measures' (to quote the British inventor of the Metric System). Can anyone envisage what the Tor would look like without the tower ?
I am getting more than a little disturbed by the number of comments I have seen that seem to excuse, or partly excuse, such acts of vandalism.

The reason thse sites are picked is bacause they are the most vulnerable, not having very high maintenance costs and even smaller profit margins.

There seems to be a perceptin that they are "fair game" for being damaged and abused.

That is an insult to those who hold them special and to our ancestors who built them.