Bryn Celli Ddu forum 12 room
Image by postman
close
more_vert

I have no expertise in geology but my guess and parsimony suggests that the markings are a result of geology and the stone itself is not petrified but was chosen because of it's appearance .

Hmmmm....interesting thread, any experts out there? Ive never visited the sight but from photos ive seen and the SWS dvd, it does look like a tree trunk with axe cuts in it.......

We,ve absolutely no doubt that the stone was chosen for its appearance - as Rupert says in the film, it would have appeared as magical to whoever placed it there. Interestingly, some of the stones used to build the monument itself are 'wood-like' in appearance, most notably the lintel and stones around the entrance. However, those stones are definitely stone whose geology lends the woody surface texture. Also those stones are slabs - that is - the stone has naturally fissured to reveal the texture.

The pillar, on the other hand, is cylindrical. And the texture seems to be a surface texture - not an outward expression of the matrix of the stone. It's one of those things that is hard to discuss without us all being in the chamber together and thrashing it out! Photos or film just does not seem to convey the sheer 'woody' presence of the thing.