>You were a bit slow there Chris.
Well I did say I was behind - it was the first time I'd read the thread.
As for the subterfuge, maybe it's aimed at possible external agencies, there are plenty of clues in there for the regulars.
>distinctive(ly rambling and incoherent).
Oi! That's genius at work there matey - you just have to understand how to read it
:-)
-Chris