juamei wrote:
My point was that you have made assumptions in your assessment of the case without the full facts. As have I. The difference is I acknowledge that fact. My annoyance was that you demanded facts and a basis for my assumptions whilst providing none yourself.
Once more.I have not made any assumptions.
The comment I made was a fact.
The only person making assumptions - 'but I'm equally sure he wanted his field flattened...' (sic) which, incidentally, you didn't acknowledge at all, was you.