Lincolnshire and Humberside forum 4 room
Image by RiotGibbon
close
more_vert

The term 'axe' could be misleading. This 'axe' could have a plough, the weight of the tool would be important for breaking the ground.
This from Caroline Malone in her book "Neolithic Britain & Ireland
"The fact that many semi-polished/ground axes are found at random in the countryside rather suggests that cultivation may have been just as important as tree-felling, which is the usual explanation for these tools"

But you have to remember that what is now countryside was once almost certainly wooded. Just because it's a field now doesn't mean it was then, so to say that it was found in a field and so can't be a tree-felling axe is a little daft.

For me it would have to be found in a neolithic farming context to even start to qualify as a farm implement rather than a tree-felling axe.

Also, remember the size of some of the stones used as hammers in the copper mines weigh over 5 kilos. They believe they may have swung these underarm .... no shit sherlock!

Don't you find Carolines book to have a considerable number of innacuracies in it?

She can't seem to measure her henges for one.