The King’s Stone forum 1 room
The King’s Stone

Attn Rhiannon

close

Rhiannon wrote:
But in a photograph to the untrained eye it looks like a prehistoric standing stone. The smr information on the Magic map is inconveniently lacking.
I've not been up close, but from about 50 yards, it does look like the genuine I-am. The lack of Magic info is always annoying when it happens. Some of the best known sites in Northumberlan apparently "Have no data".

There's another stone over by Yeavering bell that gets called the Battle Stone, allegedly to commemorate one of the countless spats during the border reiver years. There's no dout amongst the archaeologists about the antiquity of either that ot the King's stone, but the names are isleading. Indirectly, it's one of the consequences of letting romans barge in and muck up your landscape by building a daft great wall. But that's another rant entirely.

Thanks for that Hob. I do find it interesting that local 'information' becomes completely entrenched so you wouldn't even think to question it. I was looking for mention of the stone on the internet and I think every single mention repeats the old 'where the king fell' chestnut. But when you try and think about it outside the usual that's just how it is' frame, it's only then it strikes you as being bizarre and a bit unbelievable. I guess it's like all sorts of stuff you believe as a child, when you accept information unquestioningly because of the source you hear it from - it might be years and years later when you're just about to repeat it to another adult as fact, that you finally think 'what the??' and keep quiet.