Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by Jane
close
more_vert

Mustard wrote:
Sanctuary wrote:
Mustard wrote:
Sanctuary wrote:
That's what I said!
But that's never going to happen, is it? EH aren't about to shell out that kind of dosh.
So it's a pointless exercise then. They may as well reinstaste the old chalk track which we all walked up when I was younger and just maintained it as and when. Works for the banks of the Great Circle. They can then turn their attention to the roof of the WKLB which has been worn away but nobody seems to care a fig about that!
That might be the only viable solution. Personally, I'd fence it off as discretely as possible and see if that reduces numbers down to a level where damage is negligible. If that doesn't work, then the only option is to live with the fact that people will climb the hill, and do whatever's possible to mitigate any potential damage - like putting a footpath up it.
How much would 24hr security cost a year, £60/£70k? (Complete guess)

If people were charged a small fee if they wanted to get up close to the hill, thats one possible solution.

Not necessarily a popular one, but does the hill need protection or not?

Evergreen Dazed wrote:
How much would 24hr security cost a year, £60/£70k? (Complete guess)
I'd guess at around £150,0000 just on staffing costs. Three shifts every day, two people per shift. Then when you factor in all the other costs - maintenance, insurance, transport - it starts mounting up real quick. I just don't see that kind of money ever being spent. I certainly don't see people paying in sufficient numbers to put a dent in the costs.