Silbury Hill 180
Image by Meic

Thats right. Anyone that has ever stepped off a path can't criticise anything you do, so no-one can.

nigelswift wrote:
Thats right. Anyone that has ever stepped off a path can't criticise anything you do, so no-one can.
Don't be deliberately obtuse. You know full well that I've repeatedly said that I'm happy to debate the moral and philosophical position, politely and reasonably. Yet again, you're misrepresenting my position in an attempt to portray me as unreasonable. What I have actually said, is that if you can't base your criticism simply on people "breaking the rules", when you've said that you're happy to break other rules yourself. Why do you pointedly refuse to engage in mature, polite, rational debate?

nigelswift wrote:
Thats right. Anyone that has ever stepped off a path can't criticise anything you do, so no-one can.
Lets delve a bit deeeper.

Would you be good enough to explain why your illegally gaining access to Priddy is not the same as illegally gaining access to Skara Brae.

Furthermore, i'm actually suprised your access at Priddy didn't cause further problems. If the 'guardian' of the site found out you were there surely he'd have something to say to a court about you doing possible damage to the site? Meaning you may have put any prosecution of the 'guardian' in jepoardy (theoretically).