Silbury Hill 180
Image by tjj

O for Gods sake, it wasnt trespass (look it up) and it wasnt breaking a guardian's rules and the circumstances were entirely different to whats been discussed on this thread. If you want to say Ah that proves our attitude towards rules is justified and I'm "as bad as you" then go ahead. I think anyone that doesnt want to pretend otherwise will see there's a massive difference and will know precisely why youre trying to say there isnt.

nigelswift wrote:
O for Gods sake, it wasnt trespass (look it up) and it wasnt breaking a guardian's rules and the circumstances were entirely different to whats been discussed on this thread. If you want to say Ah that proves our attitude towards rules is justified and I'm "as bad as you" then go ahead. I think anyone that doesnt want to pretend otherwise will see there's a massive difference and will know precisely why youre trying to say there isnt.
Nigel, please..

Were you breaking any rules at Priddy?
If the answer is 'Yes' (which we all know it is), how can you possibly justify your previous stance on rule breaking?

Or are there indeed shades of grey after all?

nigelswift wrote:
O for Gods sake, it wasnt trespass (look it up) and it wasnt breaking a guardian's rules and the circumstances were entirely different to whats been discussed on this thread. If you want to say Ah that proves our attitude towards rules is justified and I'm "as bad as you" then go ahead. I think anyone that doesnt want to pretend otherwise will see there's a massive difference and will know precisely why youre trying to say there isnt.
Thanks, Nigel. We're now clear that you believe it's OK for you to break rules when you see fit, but other people can't break the rules that you determine are more important than other rules. ;)