Silbury Hill 180
Image by thesweetcheat

nigelswift wrote:
But of course, flouting of rules IS to the ultimate detriment of others, that's the problem, that's what millions of people understand and apply and the root of this whole argument.
No Nigel, you BELIEVE that every transgression is to the detriment of others. I don't. That's the root of our disagreement, certainly.

Again, you use emotive and loaded language that misrepresents the views of others. It's a low tactic and quite rude. I have never, at any point, recommended "flouting" any rules. To be clear, "flouting" is "to show contempt for; scorn". I do not have contempt or scorn for the rules - I simply don't believe in blindly adhering to every single rule, in every single circumstance. And I would be incredibly surprised if you've never knowingly broken any rule in any area of your life, because that would make you remarkably saintly.

Of course I have broken rules. So I flouted them. Look it up - flout - To show contempt for; scorn.

So please, flout is NOT "emotive and loaded language that misrepresents the views of others" nor is it "a low tactic and quite rude". It is a precise description.

(We could carry this on for ages yet if I wasnt going out but it would never allow either of us to escape from the accusation that when we break rules we flout them. In addition, IMO, doing so has an ultimately detrimental effect on others.)