Silbury Hill 180
Image by Kammer

nigelswift wrote:
Not you Mr M.
Glad to hear it. It might be an idea to mention who's actually being referred to in the future then, because I'm finding it very confusing - especially since I referred to dogmatism in my posts. Just to reiterate - I do believe an absolute adherence to rules in all circumstances at all times is dogmatic, but I certainly don't find the contrary view "hateful". In the context of this thread, I recognise it as a sincerely held point of view, albeit one that I disagree with.

"It might be an idea to mention who's actually being referred to in the future then"

OK, will do, but no matter as that's me done on this thread.