Protecting, monitoring and educating about those "little" sites is essential (to my mind, more essential) as concerns over the latest person to climb Silbury or build a house a few hundred yards from Avebury's banks.
Oh come off it tsc – more essential? Of course protecting, monitoring and educating Joe about "little" sites is essential but Silbury, as the largest manmade structure in Europe, is in a monumental complexity class of it’s own and rightly deserves super protecting, monitoring and the better education of its present guardians – ie the present generation. Ditto Avebury. If new houses and disrespect (in the form of tat, fast-food outlets, climbing on stones, etc, etc etc) are allowed at these two iconic sites what chance do other little sites stand.I go along however with those who rightly mention the destruction of Silbury for ‘academic’ reasons – it’s akin to the Japanese legitimizing their whaling activities for ‘research purposes’ – cobblers with a capital C!