Barry is right - the 'right to roam' is a real bonus to us stones hunters BUT the proposals outlined (and can be seen online at http://www.ca-mapping.co.uk/mapping/mal.jsp?tool=south - mind the wrapping) ARE draft and can be changed - especially on heritage and safety grounds. Indeed I would expect EH would be a statutory consultee on the maps and would certainly object to the Silbury island of yellow.

We had farmers up this way complaining that the 'right to roam' would lead to increased drug taking on their land - I couldn't quite follow this argument and it failed anyway!

Let us know how the meeting goes Pete as I feel an objection letter comin' on.

Grendel