Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by TK
Silbury Hill

Grrr​…

close
more_vert

Especially at famous, obvious, I'm-deliberately-visiting-it sites like Silbury and Stonehenge. You don't climb up Silbury thinking it's an ordinary hill. You don't stand on the lintels at Stonehenge without knowing where you are.

Perhaps, maybe, whoever piled up those horse jumps at that stone Drew visited, they weren't thinking, they were so used to seeing that stone that they don't know what it really is, so they don't value it. Or like when I used to visit 'caesar's camp' when I was a kid and believed it was roman, I didn't really know what I was looking at. But that kind of blissful unawareness doesn't really wash at a massive site like silbury or stonehenge. Surely??

[i]But that kind of blissful unawareness doesn't really wash at a massive site like silbury or stonehenge. Surely??[i]

No, not at all.

;)

Although, that's not to say EH couldn't be more proactive in stopping it.

Rhiannon wrote:
Especially at famous, obvious, I'm-deliberately-visiting-it sites like Silbury and Stonehenge. You don't climb up Silbury thinking it's an ordinary hill. You don't stand on the lintels at Stonehenge without knowing where you are.

Perhaps, maybe, whoever piled up those horse jumps at that stone Drew visited, they weren't thinking, they were so used to seeing that stone that they don't know what it really is, so they don't value it. Or like when I used to visit 'caesar's camp' when I was a kid and believed it was roman, I didn't really know what I was looking at. But that kind of blissful unawareness doesn't really wash at a massive site like silbury or stonehenge. Surely??

But not everyone appreciates the consequences of their actions. I imagine that it's simply never occurred to many people that a bloody great big hill like Silbury is actually suffering from structural problems. Sure, I imagine there's a few selfish people who would just climb it regardless, but it's not a good idea to assume that everyone is that way inclined. I've had friendly chats with people in the past who I've seen behaving in inappropriate ways, and often, they've not understood why their behaviour was a problem until it's been explained reasonably to them. I find it often helps to look for the best in people rather than assuming that you'll find the worst.

Rhiannon wrote:
Especially at famous, obvious, I'm-deliberately-visiting-it sites like Silbury and Stonehenge. You don't climb up Silbury thinking it's an ordinary hill. You don't stand on the lintels at Stonehenge without knowing where you are.
Does anybody know of anyone who was actually taken to book over climbing Silbury! What actually would they be charged with? You can't claim trespass as I believe by law you have to state this on signboards - Silbury's don't say that do they! And how could they claim that you damaged the site just by walking up it. A good lawer would have it thrown out after naming all the official bodies, TV crews and archo's that had walked up there in the past. What did they do, wear slippers?

This is TIC by the way (g)

Rhiannon wrote:
You don't climb up Silbury thinking it's an ordinary hill...... Surely??
No you don't.
But then again, maybe this bloke's opinion should be completely disregarded?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2007/jul/19/leadersandreply.mainsection

(And don'tcha love the last line, "and should set the very best of examples themselves" - which applies equally strongly to Stonehenge.)

It does'nt have to 'wash' surely?
If you feel like doing it, you can get away with it.........then bloody well do it!
I wish my back would let me climb, I would be all over megaliths like flies on the proverbial.
You can not stop people doing it, you can moan , dig, tut and come up with focus groups till the cows come home........people will climb on stones!