Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by photobabe
Silbury Hill

Grrr​…

close
more_vert

Your comment that, "When you research and wonder why something was built, like Silbury for instance, you feel it may help that research by climbing to the top to see what it was that may have encouraged the builders to build it in that location." seems to contradict your follow-up comment that, "None of us on this list would contemplate purposely causing carnage on any site as we are (errrrrr) responsible people."

You can't have it both ways. More importantly, if the sign at Silbury says...

The steep, slippery and irregular surfaces make it unsafe to allow public access and such access would damage the protected grassland and archaeology of the monument.

Please do not climb the monument

...why would anyone think they have the right to climb it for 'research' or, " ...for a view around the country side." No it isn't alright, and it isn't alright to prance around on the Stonehenge lintels at any time, or to pretend to be king of the castle here.

It isn't alright ever - that's my view as a conservator. Period.

Littlestone wrote:
You can't have it both ways. More importantly, if the sign at Silbury says...

The steep, slippery and irregular surfaces make it unsafe to allow public access and such access would damage the protected grassland and archaeology of the monument.

Please do not climb the monument

...why would anyone think they have the right to climb it for 'research' or, " ...for a view around the country side." No it isn't alright, and it isn't alright to prance around on the Stonehenge lintels at any time, or to pretend to be king of the castle here.

It isn't alright ever - that's my view as a conservator. Period.

I take it you include archo's in your list of people 'not having the right to climb it for research purposes' then? I think you've gone OTT on this matter Littlestone so am out of it period as well.