Hi June!
tjj wrote:
...What really captured my imagination, however, was that near the end of the talk JL spoke about the possibility that the siting of Silbury was chosen to mark the southern source of the Thames - as the river Kennet is a tributary of the Thames. The Thames was thought to have been a 'sacred' river similar to the Ganges and in archaeological terms we know its banks were well populated in prehistory (although most ancient sites have now been eradicated from the landscape).
That would be of conisderable importance if it was the case. Huge importance indeed...
tjj wrote:
According to Peter Akroyd's book Thames: Sacred River there are over 50 churches dedicated to St Mary (aka fertility goddess) along the route of the Thames.
Not read that one! Sounds good. Izzit!?
tjj wrote:
...at this point he referred to primordial creation myths with some enthusiasm, before he slipping back into his role as pre-historian.
A lot of archaeo's would get a lot more from the subject if they did that a bit more often, don't y' think? atb - Paul