Silbury Hill 180
Image by tjj

Moss, you're absolutely right about the "strings" - they are exceedingly intriguing, and thank you for looking up the source of the information. It seems significant that these ropes/strings were laid over the primary mound because that maybe suggests that the place was already significant and had been marked by the primary mound, with subsequent activities that recognized and augmented the specialness of the place. It's very tempting to think that the strings were connected in some way to a post that was erected on that spot.

I'm also intrigued by the composition of the primary mound, which was described as "gravel". Not an obvious material to use and without knowing any better, I'd guess that it was retrieved from the bed of a stream. Another water connection? If the stream was the Kennet, the source of the "sacred river" that runs to the sea, then the gravel could symbolically represent the all-enveloping waters that figure in the creation myths ... and then all the different local soils, plus sarsens, above would represent the Avebury people's world, created from the waters, and standing proudly above them.

Enough speculation!

I've been trying to find Tombo's writing on Silbury but sadly it seems to have gone (from TMA). Back in 2004 Rhiannon, however, posted some fascinating field notes beginning with Thoughts on Silbury's Innards: -

An account from 'An Illustration of Stonehenge and Abury' by Henry Browne, 1823 (in Wilts Arch & Nat Hist Mag v95, 2002). It's an eyewitness account of the 1776 dig.

"... This elderly gentleman [a Mr Hickley from Avebury] when a youth, was at Silbury Hill on the occasion of some miners sinking a large hole or well down the centre of it to the ground on which it began to be raised. In doing this they found a piece of timber continued down the whole way, evidently for a centre from whence to take the measurement of the hill in working it upwards."


http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/site/30/silbury_hill.html#fieldnotes

fitzcoraldo also, in November 2007, quoting from Folk Games at Silbury Hill with details provided by Mr John Goulstone, says -

An account in The Gloucester Journal on 9 November 1736 describes how a dinner was served on the summit while between 4000 and 5000 people sat at the foot of Silbury and on a facing eminence, all of which was made a very agreeable appearance. A bull was baited at the top and bottom of the hill and: There was also backsword, wrestling, bowling and dancing. The same diversions were repeated on the 2nd day, and also running round the hill for a petticoat. The 3rd day the bull was divided by Mr Smith amongst his poor neighbours on top of the hill, where they diverted themselves with bonfires, ale and roast beef for several hours...
No need to hold back on the speculation Neolith - a little speculation, after all, goes a long way.