Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by TK
close
more_vert

That I can remember, I don't believe I have been to this website ever before.

Proof. No can do.

And I am beginning to wonder, how many repeats become obnoxious silliness.

Let me try to end my participation, with my opening statement...

"I am an amateur historian, and antiquities research hobbyist. All my material is non-scientific and theory, based on previous publications and my own observations, coupled with satellite imagery when available.

My most important item I can share with the readers is that satellite software imagery, when captured and color-manipulated in a Photo manipulating software (contrasts, hues, saturation), can indicate under-water and even under-soil wall and art structures."

If that is not enough treasure value to you or to anyone, without any proof intended or implied, I am long past in the wrong place.

But one always gain in these endeavors. I am amazed at website threads I contributed to in the past, where I met with a firestorm of scientific "show me proof" resistance similar to this, and I backed off gracefully, and that thread goes on to be well-viewed long after my departure.

Some people go "ho-hum", others say "what lovely pictures you have", and some people become rabid incensed "How dare you propose theories!".

Dr. Schoch, Voyages of the Pyramid Builders...“Science is less a body of knowledge than an attitude, a willingness to lift the sacred veil and look behind it. That is what Voyages of the Pyramid Builders does. It offers the challenge of a fresh look and the thrill of exploring the new and unexpected.”

It is a wonderful world, and an amazing, amazing history we are uncovering.

Look old chap, (is that equally patronising?) for the most part people here haven't been hard on you nor has there been "a firestorm of scientific "show me proof" resistance" - although you reacted almost instantly as if there has been.

I think you've made two basic misjudgements:

a.) This is quite the wrong place to accuse people of being excessively keen on scientific orthodoxy, let alone lecture them about it as if they never heard of the concept. Google stone rowing, Cope and Silbaby, just for three. You might be quite surprised, if not chastened.

b.) Second, you've chosen to find your pictures on a few fields that many people here know every inch of and know change daily what with water and seasons and sheep etc. I even think some of the facial features you are assuming exist are in fact shadows of trees we all know well. They are also fields that have been intensively examined for hundreds of years. And the surface of Silbury, where you saw one of your faces, has been minutely scrutinised by some here weekly for the past few years. In fact, there's a reasonable case to argue Silbury's surface is just about the most intensively studied few acres on earth. So if you've discovered a face on it from 3,000 miles away you've done rather well!