The God's honest truth is that I test websites for their hysteria level, their diplomacy level.

Some websites are run like museums, post your image on the wall, people walk through and view, make their own minds, and leave.

Some websites are like Sumo wrestling matches, where your theories face a gauntlet of punches and insults. These I avoid.

And some websites are pure thuggery, including accusations of drug usage, plagiarism, and threats of lawsuits, for my own material.

Where do you think this website falls?

I never claimed to be anything more than a tourist, making observations, and attributing as to their meaning and significance, in my amateur, non academic way.

And yet, you in all your goodness, you demand some form of scientific proof, of amateur tourist observations and theories.

But it's all good, now that I understand your requirements for proof.

If the Charter of the Antiquarian website demands scientific proof, or if persons are going to become emotionally upset, as they seem to be doing, fine, I will gracefully leave, and go back to the 20 other websites where I have posted my material.

Having this wonderful experience, on this website, do you think I, as an interested tourist, would like to visit Silbury, or Avebury, or Beckhampton?

Or could I recommend anyone to this very interesting place, as a simple tourist? Many, many interesting places hate tourists, I am well aware.