Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by thesweetcheat
close
more_vert

EdZiomek wrote:
Thank you kindly for your responses. I just added two images in the Silbury Image section, for review and acceptance if possible. Also note, the photo color-manipulation is showing artwork everywhere in these areas, and the fact that corn fields are on top seem to preserve the images, not destroy them.

The latent images seem to happen because of what I am calling "wet shadows", wherein normal undisturbed soil projects varying forms of darkness, depending on its water content.

Under photo color-manipulation, stone walls, or stone outlined artwork, converging trails/roads, up to 24 inches under soil, project a lighter image, because of the lesser concentration of water content. All over England, in everyone's backyard, I am seeing wonderful objects sub soil, not knowing if they are last weekend's rugby barbeque, or 10,000 year old antiquities.

And this process works similar over water, on statues, stone pillars, though not as precise.

Nope. Sorry. Don't Get it.

Seems to me that the area surrounding the Hill has long been subject to flood and fluctuations in the water table; indeed, some might say that the Hill is a representative island surviving in a Winter Borne floodplain. You indicate that in your third paragraph that this is 'undisturbed soil" and yet this area would hardly undisturbed in my opinion. I've been on GE and cannot see the face that you can. The route of the Winterbourne is just that, and IMO not some anthropocentric fiddling with Good Ol' Mother Nature. I'd much rather stick with Michael Dames' theory of the "pregnant mother" - and I know that to be far-fetched too. Such a big head with such a little profile. Looks more likely to be a sheep track to me... Sorry.

Peace

Pilgrim

X

Pilgrim... Yours is a valid, common answer to my many theories. I see things that others do not, even in the Images Section of the Silbury Gallery, which seem to confirm the Mound wall image. And I see faces embedded in the larger Queen/King figures.

But my intent is not to prove, because I can't. My intent is not to convince you or anyone of a subjective theory point of view, I certainly can't.

My intent is to alert all responsible readers that these locations, and this methodology of color-enhancing the figures and surrounding areas, that these figures display convergent, pinpointed locations which are most probably antiquities burial points. For example, the eyes of the Queen and King, the traditional "Windows of the Soul", is plausibly where "currency", votive offerings, and incredibly valuable personal items in ceramic jars were most probably buried. Also in ancient times, coins were buried in the mouth area, on the tongue.

Competent, scientific, academic resources should protect these explicit pinpointed locations, for a careful dig. I am none of the above, but I can sit 3000 miles away and tell you the GPS location, down to a criss-crossed 20 feet or so of where they appear to be. You might be on the qualified side to do something about it, I have no idea.

On the whole, I see it, you don't, and that is fine.
Others might not see it, because they don't want to see it.
And still others, in trying to protect the locations, will claim not to see it.

Anything is possible, all is valid, including the possibility that I am wrong, but I don't think so. Now that I have informed everyone of the images that I see, and the methodology that can be used everywhere, my job is done, and this website can delete my entire contribution.

I accept and appreciate all your responsible comments, thank you.