Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by texlahoma
close
more_vert

A few days ago I submitted a post to say I had emailed my MP (cc: Dept of Culture, Media and Sport) asking about the accountability of English Heritage, specifically with regard to the management of their budget for the Silbury conservation project. Here is her reply which I reproduce in full.

Quote:
Thank you for your email of 1 January about the English Heritage work at Silbury Hill. I was most concerned to learn that the websites you have visited question the accountability of English Heritage and the conservation work being undertaken at Silbury. I am not sure from your email what in particular is the problem, apart from the need to be fully accountable to the general public. I am not familiar with English Heritage's charter, but presume they have a board to whom they are accountable. The accountability the organisation therefore has to the general public is not necessarily complete disclosure of every decision they take.

Before I make enquiries on behalf of constituents, I like to be as fully aware of the issues as possible. This is so I can ask specific questions of the organisations I am contacting, as my experience is that a general letter receives unspecific answers and is often unsatifactory for the constituent. I have had a look through the English Heritage website and was impressed with the amount of information about the excavations of Silbury Hill. There are 26 regular updates of the work, three videos (although there is some repetition in these) as well as a comprehensive five part description of the history of the hill and the current archaeological work. I found the third video very helpful in giving a picture of the work being undertaken by the contractors and English Heritage's reaction to it. There are other sections on the site, such as frequently asked questions and an email address for members of the public to ask their questions.

On viweing the site for the first time, my response was that it is a very open website giving a great deal of information to the public. I am therefore at a loss to know what else English Heritage should be supplying. Perhaps you could let me have the addresses of the archaeological websites so that I can read the comments? I have tried to find them via Google but had no success.

I look forward to hearing from you

With best wishes

Yours sincerely

Anne Snelgrove MP
Labour MP for South Swindon
End Quote

She has clearly done some homework which I respect and would like to comply with her request in the last paragraph and send her the website addresses of both Heritage Action and TMA. Do I need to obtain permission from Nigel Swift and TMA Eds before I do this. Perhaps you could advise me on any protocol that should be followed.

june (tjj)

You certainly don't need to ask permission to point anyone to the Heritage Action website but please bear in mind Heritage Action hasn't laid out its position on Silbury yet, though it will certainly do so in due course.

Thankyou for taking the time to do write your letters, and share it here.

Your MP is clearly interested, and if nudged in the direction of those areas we feel have been under-represented by EH (the plastic bags, the expert faq that never took off, the time capsule debacle, the lack of timely information during all that rain), she will no doubt yield some results.

Looking forward reading more, cheers!

WA

T tjj

During the rather emotional discussion before Christmas about plastic bags in Silbury, I chipped in by offering to write some letters. Whilst I subsequently realised that this was not welcome, I like to follow through what I start and am therefore reproducing the reply I received from English Heritage today.

Quote:
Re: Conservation Works at Silbury Hill

Thank you for your letter dated 31st December 2007 and your encouraging words about the works.

You asked about the choice of material for the bags and I am advised by our Head of Environmental Studies as follows:

"Natural bags would have introduced fresh biological material into the tunnel which would be subject to decay by biological organisms. The timber parts of the Atkinson's tunnel, such as the wooden parts of the tunnel rings have decayed and what appear to (be) fungal mycorrhizae from the decayed wood have been found in some of the looser ajacent deposits. We wish to avoid providing a new food source for this fungus or introducing new fungi or micro-organisms as far as possible and therefore decided to use polypropylene bags which are relatively inert"

Yours sincerely

Rob Harding
Project Manager
End Quote

june (tjj)