Silbury Hill 180
Image by postman
Silbury Hill

Silbury programme

Littlestone wrote:
[quote]Dunno WA, just something about the way Silbury looks today (give or take a few meters) that looks right.
I am in agreement with you - an aesthetical marvel - if she was 'flattened' at some point it's reminiscent of Marcel Duchamp's comment that his 'Large Glass' - when dropped and broken in transit - was finally complete!

interesting that the mere notion of it being pointy can be so disorienting to the mental picture of use and purpose, your whole [personal] outlook on that landscape of that period.

I wonder how the 'theories of pointiness' affect theories about the stepped area towards the top too.

I wonder how the 'theories of pointiness' affect theories about the stepped area towards the top too.
There's some interesting stuff here - http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba70/feat2.shtml which in part says -

"What of Atkinson's contention that the hill was raised in tiers? The new survey work suggests otherwise. The uppermost terrace, when circumnavigated, returns to a point several metres below the starting point - in other words, it spirals down. Weathering has obscured the detail of ledges further down the slope; but if we assume the feature is continuous, it implies a spiral path all the way from the summit to the base.

"The idea of a spiral path is attractive. It would not only have provided a processional route to the top of the hill, but would also have aided the construction of the mound. Atkinson's tiered structure poses enormous logistical problems for anyone hauling material to the higher levels. Not impossible of course; and great amounts of scaffolding, ladders, gantries and other construction paraphernalia could have been used to help. However, a spiral would have allowed easier access, and material could have been carried or dragged up to the working level with considerably less fuss."