Silbury Hill 180
Image by CianMcLiam

goffik wrote:
Pete G wrote:
On a photography forum I have been on for years there is quite a lot of decent discussion about Silbury with none of the bickering found on this one. (lots of photos too)
Yeah, but I bet they know little of it's history and of EH's history of neglect and mishandling of the situation, just that "it looks nice in a certain light". ;o)

And I bet they bicker about other things. Like the size of a lens, or the right filter to use. It's all relative.

Pete G wrote:
No doubt EH will release details when it has been analysed properly.
We'll see. Be nice to hear something.

G x

And Goof:

"Please keep on topic, and remember what the Eds said on a related thread earlier -

...EVERYONE should think very carefully about what they say. Keep it as a discussion of issues affecting Silbury, not a chance to score points and goad people who hold a different view.

We are watching.

TMA Eds*

"

Any chance you could do the same?

Alright, Paulus - I'll not get involved in this one. You're at your happiest when you're winding foums up! :) You and yer mates do a fine old job over on the Portal!

I see your mate has turned up as well! Oh, this is going to be one long and tedious bitch-fest! I'll come back in a few days and see what words of wisdom you and your mates can muster up.

BTW - "Goof" - hilarious! :D Always hilarious...

G x