Silbury Hill 180
Image by photobabe

http://www.eternalidol.com/?p=382#more-382

hare he is, its never been anywhere.
You do misinterpret a lot.
I can change the tma posting back if you want?

There doesn't seem any point in posting any sort of Silbury 'news' here anymore...

Pete G wrote:
There doesn't seem any point in posting any sort of Silbury 'news' here anymore...
lol!

G x

I wish everyone here would calm down a bit - it's only a forum!*

Pete - please continue to post Silbury news. I know everything (on all sides) appears to have reduced to sniping, but I for one would like any new info going on Silbury and environs.

*I hope that doesn't sound derogatory to the TMA Eds!

Pete G wrote:
There doesn't seem any point in posting any sort of Silbury 'news' here anymore...
And that, I think is the major point.

You have let into the wild quite a bit of information about what's happened at Silbury over the past few months Pete. And for that, we're grateful.

However, shouldn't the release of information into the public domain be something that the English Heritage publicity/marketing/press department be handling? And that they've patently failed to do, hence the complaints and moans here - because despite any protestations to the contrary, it's become apparent that *someone* from EH is reading (or has been fed information from) TMA forums.

hey pete (and Paulus)

I, for one, am interested in information/theories about the hill from people who have actually been into the 'heart of the matter'