Silbury Hill 180
Image by Chance

actualy they are as well informed as any here and don't bicker about filters or lenses. Being professional they offer help and guidance,
not like this "The tooth (if indeed there is a tooth)" from Rhubarb & Custard this morning who can't seem to open their gobs without nastiness spilling out.
sigh

Pete, youre a nutter, stop being a twat

Which forum is it?

[edit - ach! I don't even care! don't worry about it!]

G x

Oh do give it a rest Pete. Given that the only public mention (to my knowledge) of a tooth is by Dennis Price on his Eternal Idol website - someone who thinks that Stonehenge may somehow be attracting starlight and bopping off the local rabbit population (I notice with interest that that particular entry and your accompanying photo of a dead hare at Stonehenge have themselves 'mysteriously' disappeared) it's hardly surprising that we would view with a degree of scepticism anything we might read there.

As for your comment that they, "... can't seem to open their gobs without nastiness spilling out." I also notice with interest that the obscenities you let rip on this post at http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/forum/?thread=44274&message=562490 have been quietly deleted and replaced with -

At Last! A place to get Real info
(Now 100% chuckle bros free)
Perhaps you'd like to explain your reasons for the above deletions. Meanwhile, do stop the mudslinging, and do please try to keep on topic yourself.

Thanks.

LS