Silbury Hill 180
Image by Gwass

Thought you'd left the tea-room Paulus, re: your comment at http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/forum/?thread=44274&message=559126 last paragraph where you say -

"Your (StoneGlove's)* remarks and comparison's are dumb to say the least. Buy hey - your another one of the whinging, moaning crew. If it aint some north-south crap, it's probably genetic. In the meantime, we'll keep to exploring sites in the field and leave you ranters to your little computers or tea-rooms."

Just can't resist coming back for another snipe can you Paulus. And does that mean you've been following this thread all along? How flattering ;-) But wait for more bad language and more sticks and stones everyone... Paulus is very good at that, and very bad at engaging in rational debate - which I believe is what these forums are all about.

* Italics mine.

Littlestone wrote:
Just can't resist coming back for another snipe can you Paulus. And does that mean you've been following this thread all along? How flattering ;-) But wait for more bad language and more sticks and stones everyone... Paulus is very good at that, and very bad at engaging in rational debate - which I believe is what these forums are all about.
Eh? ...