Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by jimit
close
more_vert

And that's assuming they wanted to place him centrally of course. Considering we haven't the faintest idea what the monument was for that's a pretty unjustified assumption for us to make.
Not implying a connection but I think the King's Chamber of the Great Pyramid is also off-centre, though I seem to remember reading somewhere that it might be a decoy or 'failed structure' and there might be another chamber in there somewhere.

Seems hard to imagine that the builders/designers of Silbury weren't tempted to build a chamber within their amazing structure (or is that time capsule mentality creeping in :-) Would imagine that if a chamber was constructed it would have been located nearer the top (less weight). Folks already had the expertise to build stone burial chambers and then cover them with earth - can't really see why the same technique couldn't have been employed on a flat, unfinished level of Silbury and then the rest of structure built around it (think that's what was done at the Great Pyramid).

One problem - wouldn't such a chamber show up on the sonic tests that have recently been conducted at Silbury?

I presume not.
The very large voids that have developed at the centre don't seem to have been known about. The tomography results weren't exactly ideal...

"In the sections of the mound where good quality crosshole data were recorded, the frequency content was high enough to provide image resolution of approximately 2 metres. However, the major short-coming and disappointment of the survey was the quality of the crosshole data above the water table, due to extremely poor coupling between the hydrophones and the chalk hill."

Plenty of scope for missing a body or twenty there.