Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by thesweetcheat
Silbury Hill

Silbury updates lock

close
more_vert

Littlestone wrote:
...have campaigned tirelessly over many years for the right course of action to be taken with regard to the conservation of Silbury while minor irritants such as yourself do little other than try to subvert threads...
I suspect you said it all just about there. Some will criticise the content, others the context. Rather than actually contribute in a constructive way, some would rather criticise the way the argument is portrayed, the methods used, the angle taken. With little in the way of a positive contribution either for or against the argument itself, it must be assumed that they have no opinion on [or even interest in] the subject being discussed.

With little in the way of a positive contribution either for or against the argument itself, it must be assumed that they have no opinion on [or even interest in] the subject being discussed.
Aye, slumpy me hearty, let's now see what Mr Charismatic is able to contribute to our general pool of knowledge and information on this and other things megalithic.

Meanwhile, I dug this out earlier http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba80/feat1.shtml It's not too long an article and may be of interest to folks who's heads are hurting after trying to unravel 600+ posts to this thread.