Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by texlahoma
Silbury Hill

Silbury updates lock

close
more_vert

Littlestone wrote:
Unfortunate that it took someone with a title to get himself printed and noticed, when all he is doing is reiterating everything that's been stated here for months, but at least he has a little more commonsense than some.
Aye, slumpy, but Lord Avebury is more than just someone with a title, he's as straight as they come. He's also a Buddhist, and his grandfather was a great admirer of Richard Jefferies (the Wiltshire writer and mystic). We could not hope to have a more sensitive and suitable champion for the conservation of Silbury.

One line in his letter to The Guardian says it all - it encompasses both the highest principles of conservation as well as respect for the spiritual dimension of the monument -

Lord Avebury wrote

Placing a foreign object in the monument offends conservation principles, as well as the spiritual beliefs of some people.
He's a true gentleman. He's opened his heart and spoken his mind, and in turn has stopped this stupid thing going ahead.

He's a true gentleman. He's opened his heart and spoken his mind, and in turn has stopped this stupid thing going ahead.
He's certainly a true gentleman, in every sense of the word.

Compared with some at English Heritage who are supposed to be the guardians of Silbury yet see nothing wrong with holding 'acoustic events' on top of it, and decide a 'time capsule' at its heart would be a jolly little wheeze. Incompetent fools yet again springs to mind but I better not say too much in case it offends Mr Carr's sensibilities even further (or his pocketbook, as I suspect from some of his comments that he might just be on English Heritage's payroll ;-)

As always, time will tell :-)

[quote="

He's a true gentleman. He's opened his heart and spoken his mind, and in turn has stopped this stupid thing going ahead.[/quote]

Blimey I've been asleep and woken in October, either that or someone is counting chickens!

VBB