Pilgrim wrote:
...Would it be wrong of me to suggest that the reason the piece of antler you mention was made reference to was precisely because it implied a "planned act" - a relationship with a man-made archaeological phenomenon, and as such was considered out of the ordinary? ....
Actually it was out of the ordinary as it was the only bit that was found, although the Avebury 'exploration' was only for 2 weeks, in the bottom of a tree throw and was 'possibly' of mesolithic origin! Peace
Pilgrim
X