Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by moss
Silbury Hill

Silbury Round One lock

close
more_vert

"But he had already decided what that right solution was and that wasn't 'tunnelling', his solution that he campaigned fearlessly for (was someone threatening him?) was grouting; rather than re-filling with chalk. "

Totally, totally untrue.
Our Campaign has always been and always will be what's least damaging for Silbury, as decided by independent structural experts with no interference from anyone else or any other issue.
On Saturday for the first time ever, on the basis of acknowledged gaps in his knowledge, a proper expert told the public his opinion.
That, subject to his further consideration in the light of as much further research as can be done, is progress. About time too.

Reread your own vitiolic posts on Heritage Action - you are vehemently against, what you describe (emotively) as 'tunnelling'. At one stage you make claims for a new tunnel - "A new and larger tunnel would be bored into the heart of the mound from the side, involving much disruption to Silbury itself, risk of additional collapse, huge expense and years of further delay."

The volumetric figures you talk about are taken out of context, and again used to back up your own personal preferences for grouting.