Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by Chance
Silbury Hill

Silbury Round One lock

close
more_vert

Well done sbp. That was a sensible bit of communication. (I know, I know, you don't care what people think etc...).

Having not been at the meeting, I couldn't offer any comment on the amount of Silbury that will be extracted, but (strangely) I would be interested to hear if you think that EH have been saying this all along. Or has there been a change in their plans regarding how much original (non-backfill) material will be extracted during tunnelling?

Links to relevant EH text would be nice, but no pressure, I'll not really give a flying eff if you can't be arsed, (or even if you just don't know!)

"I would be interested to hear if you think that EH have been saying this all along. Or has there been a change in their plans regarding how much original (non-backfill) material will be extracted during tunnelling?"

It seems to me the 'extra tunnelling' has been overstated by some, and the original EH report only ever said extra material (with a figure in cubic meters), might have to removed if it was necessary, in a worse case scenario, in the risk assessment. However it always been EH's declared intent to remove the minimum material necessary to safely backfill the tunnel.

A possible worse case scenario was enlarged upon today, with the example where when the struts of the corroded tunnel supports have to be removed it is possible that a small amount of material where they contact the 'tunnel' might have to be removed as well.

I believe the report is online, someone will have the link I'm sure, but I'll have a looksee too.

EH site

http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/server/show/category.8613

Conserving Silbury Hill page, the Risk Assessment is called 'Silbury Hill Assessment' (5mb pdf)

(Found in the cellar, in a filing cabinet, in a folder marked....!!!!) ;-)