Hi, Littlestone,

>It's fun and interesting to speculate - the seemingly intentional 'flatness' at the top of Silbury just screams out that there was either something there or that something once went on there, and the value of discussing that possibility might just lead us closer to understanding what that 'something' might have been.<

Aye, and I read somewhere recently (possibly online) that the top of the Hill is the same diameter as the primary mound that has been so callously mauled by the search for buried treasure and academic immortalism.

Peace

Pilgrim

X