Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by Meic
close
more_vert

Peter, just so you know I welcome your comments and am happy to debate with you without it becoming a personal matter. I fully believe all viewpoints are valid and if you do not agree with the campaigners then it is we who have failed to get our message across properly.

I have a backlog of sites that are being destroyed as we speak, if I did not think Silbury was important I would not spend my time on the subject.

I can understand your point about needing to get this fixed ASAP but I'd suggest that if you held the purse strings on this project you would be very close to sacking the consultant by now - five years just to decide how to fix it is far too long - It's already cost £600k, how much will a repair/archaeology strategy cost? Is there not simply an option to fix it without any further archaeological intervention?

I have no problem with that BN and I have the greatest respect and admiration for you and your endeavours - and that is not bull shit. It's because we care so much that we get so steamed up and angry about delays, damage, vandalism, bureaucracy and all the other horrors that afflict the ancient places that we care about. And sometimes we just have a go at each other out of frustration, because we can't hit out at the real villains. I understand that and perhaps that is also a valuable function of this forum.

Yes - of course I would sack the consultants and that is why I'm horrified at more delays and more consultations and more paper and more talk ad infini-bloody-nitum!

Yes - I agree with you about the perilous position of heritage in this country. It's better here than elsewhere in the world if you read half the stuff that comes across my desk from France, USA, eastern Europe and elsewhere. That is no comfort of course and our philistine government should be ashamed of its track record. EH has had its budgets slashed, its staff slaughtered and some projects now rely on lottery funding! I don't blame EH for that and continue to believe that they are doing the best they can but the odds are heavily against them. I also believe that we should work with them and try to influence decisions rather than confront and simply bang heads against brick walls. Others will disagree and that is their right. May their head-banging prevail!

Yes- I agree that grass roots organisations and individuals must shout loud and often about damage, neglect, exploitation and inappropriate developments that threaten ancient sites. We each need to fight our own corners and each of us individually cannot fight every threat everwhere. My fight is to prevent the expansion of Stansted Airport - that will flatten more listed buildings than Hitler's Luftwaffe did! The damage to unknown archaeology in this stoneless (and thus not visible and sexy) but heavily settled prehistoric landscape will be staggering. eg - we have 11 henges but you cannot see anything of them on the ground.

However robust the discussion among ourselves may be - we should not forget that we are on the same side. We should never lose sight of the real enemy either - fat cat extraction companies, developers, bureaucrats, landowners, politicians and mindless vandals.