Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by GLADMAN
close
more_vert

" I honestly thought that (tunnelling) would be welcomed by all and was dismayed to see immediate hostility and opposition to it."

That's because as you state you - " have no specialist knowledge"

"I can only form my opinion from what I read." With respect that cannot have been much up until recently, beacuse EH didn't pass anything on until the BA articles, and they would not have done that had they not been commissioned.

Now thanks to the campaign that has gained the meeting, there is also comprehensive material on the EH website albeit it is like the BA articles - spun.

"Perhaps HA has sought expert opinion from elsewhere and have got a better practical solution to offer. "

The great British public consists of experts from all walks of life, many of whom have an interest in history/heritage, but they can't apply their knowledge to a problem unless they know about it that is why some of us have spent five years arguing for transparent public information. Elsewhere you alluded to me and others as amateurs, but you overlook that we are also professionals. Some are academics, some engineers, other surveyors. One of the people you address is directly involved with Silbury but through attempting to keep their pension and future employment can't say who they are; the fact they are keen for the public to have more information and have a say should tell you something !

"In reality I fear that you will be patronised and at best may modify their scheme"

There is every chance of the first and no chance of the second.

"at worst you will delay the start of remedial work perhaps beyond the point of Silbury's stability"

EH don't stop their plans to consider the public ! Tenders are going out as I type if not in the post already and work will not start until a scheme's details are agreed and suitable weather arrives. As for Silbury's stability, there are no concerns there.

" My over riding concern is that more talk will mean more delay "
Even if it did, this is democracy attempting a foothold - besides there will be no delay.

"No point in going on and on,"

something we can at least agree on.

We at long last have some information on the website and a meeting - other than making sure enough interested parties attend and the right questions are asked I don't think there is much more to be said. other than - anyone travelling on Friday and staying over who wants to meet for a quiet beer don't make it the Bear as EH VIPs will be staying there.

VBB

I wish you well, but judging from your own remarks you see little or no chance of influencing the outcome. Guess we all like to tilt at windmills sometimes...

"- anyone travelling on Friday and staying over who wants to meet for a quiet beer don't make it the Bear as EH VIPs will be staying there."

But that is exactly where you should be! Eavesdropping and getting at EH VIPs over a pint or a G&T is precisely when you MIGHT influence them. Guerilla tactics - not trench warfare!

Doh!

To add to what VBB has said, and then I'm going to leave it as I'm as irritated as VBB -

Peter, you say -
"Perhaps HA has sought expert opinion from elsewhere and have got a better practical solution to offer."

Have you not understood what we have said all along? There are several solutions. We have merely said, consistently, the most damaging one appears to have been chosen, without explanation. We simply call for a public explanation. What's so peculiar about that???

Your various remarks appear to add up to this:

We are "well meaning amateurs" and perhaps ought to defer to EH else we risk causing a delay. In any event, we'll probably be bamboozled by them so we should "enjoy" the meeting.

Well, as VBB has said, this meeting is quite a slice of history, was achieved at no small cost in effort and should be treated seriosly, not dismissed in a sentence. It may not work, but it's what we've got and it damn well matters.

We are amateurs, but well able to read the documents. Having done so, our strong impression is that tunnelling is NOT the least damaging solution, by a big margin. Perhaps EH will show otherwise, but how anyone can have come to a different conclusion right now beats me. Please explain.

For myself, I feel unwilling to change my tune merely because EH have announced, without the least explanation, that they've decided to tunnel. As it happens, I have very many years of oblique professional experience of structural engineering in the context of collapsed tunnels. Rather more, for instance, than an archaeology doctorate would have given me. Ergo, unless EH do what they've very significantly failed to do despite repeated requests - get REAL experts to say independently and very clearly that tunnelling is the least damaging option then I'm not up for trusting their intentions in the light of my understanding.

As for worrying about further delay, that seems to be based upon a further imperfect understanding of what has been revealed so far. So far as I understand it, and I suspect VBB will agree, the damage caused by the very act of tunnelling is likely to be greater than very many years worth of doing absolutely nothing.

That's what the risk assessment strongly suggests. What would you have us do? Not ask for an explanation?