Q. How manyy archaeologists understand Neolithic remains that actually get to decide ontheir importance?
Q. How many archaeologists are actually expert?
Q. Is an archaeologist the right expert to decide on how best to repair subsidance?
Q. At Thornborough before I came along the archaeologists had made the decision. By your logic me being a well meaning amateur disqualifies me from saying much about the destruction of ancient sites at all.
A. Lets let the "experts" (who in the main have very little formal training for the jobs that they are expected to do) get on and do what they want with ancient sites, they are after all the people who know best, as has been proven time and time again...
You know in my job I work with loads of experts. They build things for me. It's amazing how many of those "experts" are temps, unqualified and generally do not have a clue what they are doing. It is also amazing the number of times I have to step in, understand what the issue is and tell the experts how to solve their problems. I normally sense trouble by a certain lack of communication followed by innordinate delays and if I don'e step in - ultimate failure in the project.
In addition, I personally think the term amateur is a petty one. Many people on this list know a lot more about megaliths than a great many archaeologists ever will. That includes you.