And apart from the stunning disparity in PREDICTED new losses we have this:

8.3.4.3
NO PREDICTION can be made for the amount of UNINTENTIONAL DAMAGE that might occur (through collapse caused by work disturbance).

Repeat, ALL we're asking for is that an explanation for such an apparently illogical choice to be provided to the public. Nothing else.
As VBB implies, how can anyone possibly oppose that call?