Central London forum 4 room
Image by tuesday
close
more_vert

thesweetcheat wrote:
Also, most of the objects were carved stone/bone, so I'm not sure how damaging a slightly raised light level would be? (If lighting affecting the modern pictures was a concern, they could have lost them from the exhibition, for all they added).
The problem is that different light levels within the same gallery can confuse the eye so a (safe) uniform level throughout is preferred; that's set at accepted levels for all the objects on display. Sometimes the levels may seem too low but the eye does usually adapt.

The real disappointment of the exhibition (for some at least) was the inclusion of 'modern' art. The exhibition organizers didn't seem confident enough to present it (the exhibition) without the modern art element and I think that was a serious miscalculation. The 'Ice Age' art artifacts really swept the board and stood head and shoulders above the modern art element; the latter just was not needed.

That said, this really is an exhibition worth seeing...

Littlestone wrote:
The real disappointment of the exhibition (for some at least) was the inclusion of 'modern' art. The exhibition organizers didn't seem confident enough to present it (the exhibition) without the modern art element and I think that was a serious miscalculation. The 'Ice Age' art artifacts really swept the board and stood head and shoulders above the modern art element; the latter just was not needed.
I disagree with this negative view strongly. Its a while since I was at the exhibition, I recollect however, that the modern art was discreetly placed at the end of the exhibition in order to give a sense of continuity. It was saying we are the same people making sense of what what is important in our world through art. The two Joseph Hecht hangings (engraving and etching) echoed the cave paintings and were beautifully simple in their own right.
Not a miscalculation in my opinion - rather a creative interpretation.