Jeezus! Well if old Muddy has been banned, based on the venmous diatribe vomited from old Littlestones touchy-touchy fingers, I too must echo thwe word of WhatisThat: "Why doesn't someone ban this asshole?" Littlestone's words are appalling by any standard. He likes to talk - and talk - and pontificate - and talk - endlessly, putting people down and seeing it as funny at times, belittling people. If old Muddy's been banned for simply acting as a mirror to some people occasionally, and simply saying things that most of us would like to say but constantly don't (we'd rather not get involved to be honest - and there are many of us who think this), then Littlestone needs kicking off this site.

If not, why not? And before fellow members of the Rat Pack - as we call them - wanna jump in and throw their words, I wanna hear some sense from the Eds please?

> I am more disappointed that the silent majority are colluding by silence.

Alright then. I'm not sure if I'm part of this "rat pack" or not, but probably am because I thought Littlestone's diatribe was entirely justified!

I'm more surprised by those that find Muddymick's aggressive posts acceptable, frankly. The bloke was a wind-up merchant and deliberately set out for such responses, and therefore got what he deserved, in my opinion.

I'll not get dragged in any further, suffice to say that I'm no longer "colluding by my silence". That's my opinion aired.

G x