Avebury forum 222 room
Image by Jane
Avebury

Alexander Keiller's Avebury

close
more_vert
Harryshill H
Harryshill Jan 21, 2013 22:40:00
Replying to harestonesdown

harestonesdown wrote:
Harryshill wrote:
Lol. Your stalling.

Raising the stones won't protect them and you know it

I know it wont, though i'm of the view they wouldn't need protecting.

Let's say a buried piece of sarsen would last 10 million years, though it'd never be seen, a re-erected piece lasts 9 million years and is enjoyed by a countless number of people, is that a good trade off ? imo yes.

One of the 'factual' reasons for raising the stones at Avebury was that it would help protect the stones both from what, weathering? and theft

This I believe is factual 'bull shite'

H Harryshill
Harryshill Jan 21, 2013 22:41:03
Replying to Harryshill

Factual, is of interest to me.

H harestonesdown
harestonesdown Jan 21, 2013 22:42:10
Replying to Harryshill

Harryshill wrote:
harestonesdown wrote:
Harryshill wrote:
Lol. Your stalling.

Raising the stones won't protect them and you know it

I know it wont, though i'm of the view they wouldn't need protecting.

Let's say a buried piece of sarsen would last 10 million years, though it'd never be seen, a re-erected piece lasts 9 million years and is enjoyed by a countless number of people, is that a good trade off ? imo yes.

One of the 'factual' reasons for raising the stones at Avebury was that it would help protect the stones both from what, weathering? and theft

This I believe is factual 'bull shite'

Well i guess i should let others answer that as they aren't my reasons for wanting re-erection.