Avebury forum 222 room
Image by morfe
close
more_vert

Lanolin’s good for your skin but is it good for the stones?

Littlestone wrote:
Lanolin’s good for your skin but is it good for the stones?
This is Fly-strike (Blow-Fly) season in the sheep world LS and the sheep rub their rear ends against stationary objects to get rid of the eggs or maggots if the fly has laid eggs on them. Having to deal with sheep that have fly strike and seeing what it can do to them if left, the stones would be the last thing on my mind...and I'm a devotee!!!

Not technically unemployed either, are they?

I should have thought that a bit of lanolin was the last thing that would have any real effect on the stones after everything the British weather throws at them. It may even protect them.

Some might say now ewe are taking the piss, LS! ;)

G x

Littlestone wrote:
Lanolin’s good for your skin but is it good for the stones?
Quite a coincidence that the burial of stones in the thirteenth century coincided with the monks clearing land to accommodate huge numbers of sheep. The sheep snapped by Moss have been treated yet still habitually as you point out rub up against the stones, and of course undermine the areas around the stones by congregating and sheltering, so might topple if they weren't stuck in concrete. Shepherds back then had to treat and replace sheep at their own expense, they carried tools to snip wool from the rear end to discourage fly strike and to deal with bloat, and had lamb warming pockets just like the modern Barbour. I bet you would still be able to make it serviceable had it say been buried beneath a stone for 700 years :)