Well my main issue was them setting a precedent, a very dangerous one.
With respect the druids have no claim to these bones, well no more so than any other British citizen and in that context do have a right to an opinion on the subject, this was considered and in the end the majority of people saw sense (imo) and the right decision was made.
The bones in question are so far removed from any living person that they can't be seen to be tied to anyone emotionally (imo)
Also no religious group can claim these remains as one of their own, we don't honestly know (and never can) what religion the living person would have followed despite all the sites being labelled "pagan", there just isn't any evidence to back it up.