Taking your point and that made by Peter elsewhere on this thread, should there then be a ceiling to how much is spent on heritage ?
I mean wasn't there surely an element within govt let alone the people that looked at the bill for Stonehenge and went WHOA- HOLD ON THUR ! We can't have all these people waiting months for hips and heart valves and refuse cancer drugs by postcode and lash out on these stones just for stone lovers and tourists ?
I mean- I know the calculated figure for fixing Silbury and I would rather have that done than dig up stones that we don't know which way up they were let alone which way they were pointing and in what period.
VBB