Avebury forum 222 room
Image by Chris
close
more_vert

For over twenty years I've been filming commercials and effects and many times I have been summoned by the producer to be shown the results and explain or rather lay the blame on someone, for a fault with the image. I have got quite good at working out what had happened. Film lenses are carefully protected from light falling on it from outside the picture area. This not only minimise flares but prevents stray light bouncing around inside the camera. Sadly I have been able to work out the faults in the photographic process every time. Treemans and goffiks orbs are clearly out of focus droplets illuminated and frozen by the camera flash. S.T.'s luminous lines I would suspect are skratches in a color layer of the emulsion as they are sharper than anything else the lens resolved on the image. Still, I got some wierd defects on a car advert recently, where the car was being painted with a flash (torch) light on every frame of film for about 30 seconds that I couldn't explain. What I find more challenging is seeing something wonderful or mysterious, photographing it and trying to work out why, dissapointingly, the illusion is not there or the picture is boring.

Thank you for that information, laresident. It is always good to hear analysis from someone with expertise relating to whatever it may be. Certainly I have no emotional or other attachment to a paranormal explanation of the Avebury orbs. In fact I tend to be quite sceptical of such interpretations, and sometimes wonder about the strength and resilience of some people's need to believe that they have photographed ghosts, spirits, Jesus, Elvis, the reincarnation of Paul Revere's horse, or whatever it may be this week.

But when you mention raindrops, do you feel that these were on the lens or in the air? There was some showery rain around that night, but I remember confining photographs to the dry spells. Perhaps there were still stray drops about.

You obviously have a lot of experience relating to photography including development processes. There are two other pictures in my collection that are puzzling. The first is of a mound - possibly Roman, perhaps a little later - in Morden Park, London. Apparently hovering several feet above one side if the mound is a pure white, shining, not-quite-perfect disk or sphere. Several points about this:
(1) I visually saw nothing unusual while taking the photograph;
(2) the disk/sphere is quite unlike most of the orb images that appear on the web, which mostly resemble the Avebury ones - semi-transparent, multiple, often overlapping. However the Morden whatever does resemble an "earthlight" image, dated 25th September 1982, that I noticed posted on the "International Earthlight Alliance" website;
(3) it is kinda spooky.

While I am quite prepared to be told that the Morden light is the result of some film or development fault, the second image is another matter altogether. A few years ago, in the Black Mountains in western Wales, I saw and managed to photograph what I have ccme to call a "rainbow ball". As the photo shows, it was a day of mixed sun and showers. Suddenly I saw, in the distance but clearly, what seems to have been an unusual type of rainbow, not far from ground level. Unusual, firstly because it was round rather than elongated and curved. Also, the colours were churning in a way that I had previously only seen in the lightshows of certain first generation psychedelic bands. Yet they were rainbow colours. And - except for the breathtaking dynamism of the "ball" - the best photo pretty much captured what I saw. Since then I have done some research on atmospheric light phenomena generally but have found nothing that resembles this. Nor does it seem to be discussed in the recent "earthlights" literature by people like Paul Devereux.

I do not yet have these photos digitally scanned but will do shortly. All this stuff is bubbling because I have written a commentary on each of them that I am going to post on www.earthlights.com. Meanwhile there has been a lot by way of interesting and positive response - your own included - to my original Avebury orbs posting here, so I will e-mail copies to Mod.Ant. as well, to see what people make of them. Any thoughts would be very welcome.

Thanks again,

Treeman