Alton Priors forum 2 room
Image by juamei
close
more_vert

>> ... but that stone worship was specifically rejected by the church and not absorbed into Christianity.

should read "but that stone worship was specifically rejected by the <i>Roman</i> church and not absorbed into Christianity."

The Irish church, which very nearly became the norm instead of the Roman, did consume stones and the Irish version of Catholicism today still does. Bullaun stones in particular are a big part of Xtian sites. All over Ireland there are stones dedicated to various saints - but usually the big two: Brigit and Patrick. So-called <i>Celtic Christianity</i> actually reached far into Europe and it wasn't until C12 that Rome started to truly dominate. The Pontif may have been against stones as idols, but that only represeented two thirds of the church in C7-C12 Europe. Irish monasteries, practicing the Irish varaiety of Christianity, were spread as far as Austria and even dominated soem regions of France and what is now Germany.

Unfortunately, the Roman Catholic propaganda machine has done much to destroy the history and true power of their early rivals, so we can only quote the words of the Roman church from that period, which is a real shame and makes most arguments very unbalanced and unrealistic.

Actually, here's a second (but related) thing.

In England the Catholics took to having their services in people's houses when they were outlawed. During Penal times in Ireland when Catholicism was illegal the people took their services into the wilds and held them in the open air at what are now called Mass Rocks. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of these all over Ireland. They are basically big boulders with crosses carved in them. I know this is a lot later than you were talking about above, but it does demonstrate that worship at rocks was still part of the Xtian psyche here in Ireland. A few stone circles were used during this period too.

When I have time I intend try and take more notice of the mass rocks. Were they in what could be significant ancient locations or were they just rocks chosen for thier remoteness? There's probably a doctorate in that question for someone!

Just like holy wells most of the bullaun stones, even the ones not associated with early Xtian sites, are said to cure things.

Yes -that's a fair point. I am led to believe that when the early missions came to the Saxon kingdoms they were expecting everyone to be pagan. It came as a shock when they found many Christians among the populations. Of course, Christians hate heresy even more than paganism and so conflict was inevitable. Interesting when you read Bede - he gives no credit whatsoever to "Celtic" Christianity

for bullauns look at lingas - fertility (sex) connotations, also ...

http://www.asianart.com/patan-museum/full/linga_f.jpg

http://www.megalithomania.com/hires/800x600/feaghna.jpg

think also of 'cup and ring' marks on stones . . .