Sounder wrote:
Hi All - may be old news to those that get the mag but thought it might be of interest to some:
There's pictures in the magazine, it take a lot of believing that somehow all the stuff he found was actually 'real' or natural chalk marks..the 'spectacled' creature could be something totally different, and of course with Margaret Murray as an ally he lost his case with the archaeologists... there is an 18th letter though, which may not be in miscellaneous on Wandlebury, which I'll type up but its a bit confusing... http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba112/feat3.shtml
Also mention at the bottom of a biography.