Deerleap Wood Barrow forum 1 room
Image by GLADMAN
close
more_vert

thesweetcheat wrote:
The reality is, as Moss suggests, the difference between scheduling and actual prevention/policing of damage. The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 (the primary legislation behind current scheduling) doesn't mention planting of trees. Section 2 and Schedule 1 cover "control of works", but there's nothing about planting or plants/trees at all. So it seems that unless planting a tree constitutes "works", it may not be prevented by the legislation.

The barrows around Avebury have been tree-covered for a long time and I doubt that 'new' trees are deliberately planted now (although no doubt some may self-seed).

Nevertheless "It means that it is an offence to damage it without written permission ." Get permission to plant yer trees , bosh ,job done .

Sadly, that sounds bout right. Assuming you don't need planning permission to plant trees, PPS5 would have no clout at all.

From the looks of things, a quick read of the text of the 1979 act indicates that if the local county archaeologist was prepared to hassle the secretary of state, currently the lovely Mr Pickles, an agreement of stweardship could be put in place which could, depending on the way the agreement is worded, preclude any planting, even retrospectively in the case of planting done since the act was last amended. I could just be making leaps of wishful thinking here mind you.

There's a lot of concern in some places about the effects of planting near rock art panels, much of which was done before 1979. The problem isn't only the effects of the roots and stuff, but also wht happens if a tree falls, gouging out a big chunk of soil, or what happens during deliberate harvestng, where the industrial machinery used can easily wreck the surroundings.

tiompan wrote:
Get permission to plant yer trees , bosh ,job done .
I happened across this today which says the same thing, sort of.
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/professional/advice/our-planning-role/consent/smc/

But....

"Some types of work, generally related to agriculture or gardening, where these activities are already being carried out, are allowed to go ahead without consent. Our relevant regional team will be able to provide further advice on what requires consent."

Sounds like it would be a case by case approach. Anyway, until badgers are prosecuted we'll never have justice in this country.